Conference Forum

Forum >> Leagues >> II 2  

Post ID	Date & Time	Game Date	Function
#19748	03/13/2023 9:49:50 am	Jan 9th, 2031	Ignore
TavesSoul Joined: 06/25/2020 Posts: 142 Nazareth Golden Flyers IV.8	2031 Mid-Season Review
#19831	03/31/2023 10:21:14 am	Mar 9th, 2031	Ignore
TavesSoul Joined: 06/25/2020 Posts: 142 Nazareth Golden Flyers IV.8	2031 Season Review
#20061	05/08/2023 5:16:23 am	Jan 15th, 2032	Ignore
TavesSoul Joined: 06/25/2020 Posts: 142 Nazareth Golden Flyers IV.8	2032 Midseason Review
#21347	05/11/2024 2:44:53 pm	Oct 27th, 2038	Ignore
plokmijn Joined: 03/19/2020 Posts: 90 Alabama Crimson Tide I.1	2039 II.2 Prediction Title Contenders: 1. Ursinus 2. Wake Forest 3. Alabama Fighting for promotion: 4. Marist 5. Fresno Pacific 6. Massachusetts Maritime Academy 7. Richmond Chillin' in the middle: 8. Nazareth On-the-bubble: 9. College of Charleston 10. Rockhurst 11. New Orleans Uphill battle to avoid demotion: 12. Baylor 13. Cedarville 14. Indiana 15. Colby 16. Miami Ohio Ranking is based on an old rating spreadsheet I used to have a couple of years ago and am trying to recreate. I see some obvious teams that are ranked much higher/lower than I expected, so it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
#21354	05/12/2024 7:37:14 pm	Oct 30th, 2038	Ignore
Joyd Joined: 08/25/2021 Posts: 13 Miami Ohio RedHawks II.2	Funniest thing I've seen all day
#21356	05/13/2024 8:47:30 am	Oct 30th, 2038	Ignore
plokmijn Joined: 03/19/2020 Posts: 90 Alabama Crimson Tide I.1	Feel free to disagree, but you have almost no perimeter defense in a league with plenty of elite guards.
#21393	05/19/2024 8:19:09 pm	Nov 25th, 2038	Ignore
plokmijn Joined: 03/19/2020 Posts: 90 Alabama Crimson Tide I.1	Found a flaw with the previous rating system, so I updated team rankings with the all new Weighted Plok Index (TM) rating: 1. Alabama 83.87 2. Wake Forest 81.16 3. Ursinus 78.85 4. Richmond 77.76 5. Marist 76.97 6. Massachusetts Maritime Academy 76.89 7. Nazareth 76.51 8. Fresno Pacific 76.15 9. Miami Ohio 73.44 10. Colby 73.01 11. Rockhurst 72.12 12. College of Charleston 72.08 13. Baylor 70.21 14. Indiana 70.02 15. Cedarville 68.84 16. New Orleans 65.95 Miami Ohio's ranking should be more accurate now (lol). This is mostly a rating of roster construction with height and positionally relevant skills weighed for each player and then combined in the same way WSI is calculated. Some teams I would expect to be able to outperform their ranking (Cedarville) based on tactical adjustments and playing key players bigger minutes. Other teams I would expect to underperform this ranking because their manager sucks (Alabama).
#21402	05/24/2024 9:32:57 am	Dec 9th, 2038	Ignore
Ced Joined: 02/14/2018 Posts: 442 Indiana Hoosiers III.3	15. Cedarville 68.84 You can't spell Cedarville without Ced.
#21408	06/03/2024 5:42:17 am	Jan 13th, 2039	Ignore
TavesSoul Joined: 06/25/2020 Posts: 142 Nazareth Golden Flyers IV.8	2039 Midseason Review Updated Monday, June 3 2024 @ 5:43:40 am PDT
#21425	06/17/2024 9:27:22 am	Mar 3rd, 2039	Ignore
Joyd Joined: 08/25/2021 Posts: 13 Miami Ohio RedHawks II.2	Don't let Illinois know Hodson signed with Cedarville

| |

Reply